Gold: A Solution for Zero-Beta Satellites

In a previous piece, I illustrated a more active approach to core-satellite portfolio construction. While managing the core in a pro-active way mostly deals with fine tuning a multi-beta exposure and then applying active risk management, more creativity can be utilized for the satellite.

In this regard, there are probably two main approaches: active alpha or crisis alpha.  The first would require a strategy geared toward exploiting market anomalies that may lead to superior performance; such outperformance may realize itself via concentrated and targeted bets or via uncorrelated performance when measured over a certain timeframe. On the other hand, the latter would implement a strategy not only generally uncorrelated to the traditional core but that would be able to produce superior performance especially during times of great stress for traditional asset classes. 

This is an important distinction often overlooked: alternative investments which are usually generalized as a solution for alpha exposure may provide superior performance (especially over longer time frames) but not necessarily at times of significant liquidity and credit breakdowns for traditional asset classes.  A detailed factor analysis may uncover superior returns for many alternative strategies; however, it may also reveal a degree of sensitivity to fundamental price drivers common to traditional assets which may be much higher than desired.  Only a few strategies seem to be providers of crisis alpha or outperformance in time of significant stress in traditional betas: gold seem to fit that definition.

The successful run of the precious metal in the last ten years has been sparked by a confluence of positive factors such as extremely easy global monetary policy and a socio-economic transition from an age of optimism to a zero-sum era.  These elements reversed a downward trend in gold entrenched since the famous top in the early 1980s.  Central banks have been reversing their selling course as well as they relaxed their monetary policy.

This new dynamic rendered gold a stronger candidate for portfolio allocation.  Gold ability to provide crisis alpha makes it a perfect asset for inclusion in a zero-beta satellite.

Gold does not produce a stream of cash-flows which makes it difficult to analyze it based on classic valuation metrics such as DCF models, leaving most of the analytical work reliant on the study of supply and demand.  However, as the metal increases its magnetism for investment flows, its continued lack of correlation to traditional asset classes becomes the ultimate analytical input.

The World Gold Council ran a number of interesting statistics and scenarios in a recent working paper[1] showing how gold has been a consistent risk diversifier in addition to its traditional role as a store of wealth.

Their analysis showed that a 3.3% to a 7.5% allocation to gold (depending on the composition of the portfolio and the investor currency of reference) can improve the risk adjusted profile of the allocation even when other alternative assets are included.

In one of the tables produced by the study, we can see two different portfolios, a standard one allocated 55% equities, 25% fixed income, 5% cash and 15% alternative investments, and a conservative version allocated 30% equities, 50% fixed income, 10% cash and 10% alternative assets.  The portfolios were tested for the trading period from January 1987 to June 2011 utilizing US Dollar denominated assets.  In all cases portfolios with gold included scored higher Information Ratios with an optimal allocation to gold between 3.3% and 4.4%.

In this new turbulent investing environment, it is my belief that the old approach of trading around the mean hoping that investment returns will conform to an unrealistic bell curve will continue to disappoint and a more aggressive approach toward hedging and/or exploiting tail risk will continue to be key for some time.

Got gold?

Disclaimer: PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THEREFORE, NO CURRENT OR PROSPECTIVE CLIENT SHOULD ASSUME THAT FUTURE PERFORMANCE OF ANY SPECIFIC INVESTMENT AND/OR INVESTMENT STRATEGIES MADE REFERENCE TO ABOVE AND RECOMMENDED OR UNDERTAKEN BY CERVINO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, WILL BE PROFITABLE OR EQUAL THE CORRESPONDING INDICATED PERFORMANCE LEVELS. DIFFERENT TYPES OF INVESTMENTS INVOLVE VARYING DEGREES OF RISK, AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT ANY SPECIFIC INVESTMENT WILL EITHER BE SUITABLE OR PROFITABLE FOR A CLIENT OR PROSPECTIVE CLIENT'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO. HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR INVESTMENT INDICES AND/OR PORTFOLIO BENCHMARKS DO NOT REFLECT THE DEDUCTION OF TRANSACTION AND/OR CUSTODIAL CHARGES, THE DEDUCTION OF ADVISORY MANAGEMENT FEES, NOR THE IMPACT OF TAXES, THE INCURRENCE OF WHICH WOULD HAVE THE EFFECT OF DECREASING HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS.

HYPOTHETICAL RISK DISCLOSURE: HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN, IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

---

[1] World Gold Council, Gold: Alternative Investment, Foundation Asset, October 2011

Excerpts From Cervino Capital Management 2012 Market Outlook

12/28/2011

The business of forecasting is often a foolish endeavor; financial author and “enfant terrible” Nassim Taleb called the process of financial divining being “fooled by randomness” in his book by the same title.  And yet every year, most financial participants will spend thousands of words dispensing their prognostications about the following 12 months.  Admittedly, I am afflicted by the same disease, although my discretionary approach to investing and trading allows me for a convenient degree of flexibility in changing my positions when it becomes apparent that the assumptions of the original prediction were unfortunately wrong.

This year the dynamic of forecasting seems even more foolish than ever; the European crisis remains largely unresolved and still centerpiece to every future macroeconomic development.  The first quarter in 2012 will see $850 billions of debt to be rolled over and 1/3 of that amount just from Italy.  Should the market continue to keep interest rates above 7% for Italian debt, the pressure on the ECB to intervene in dramatic fashion will probably prove unstoppable.  Any large scale intervention by the ECB should calm markets and ignite a new leg up in gold.  A refusal of the ECB to bend to market and political pressures might prove highly deflationary and possibly result in a reformation of the Euro currency.

The development of the Euro crisis influences all markets with the results of increasing correlations across the board.  The Euro should remain weak but volatile as every time a positive piece of news is leaked by Brussels, Paris or Frankfurt, short covering rallies will continue to occur in swift manner.  Equities all over the world will also remain hostage to Europe.  European stocks seem cheaper than US equities but much closer to the epicenter of the crisis.  US stocks are not tremendously expensive but, in a world of higher correlations, still exposed to a dire recession in Europe and a now manifest slow-down in emerging economies.  The level of EPS for US stocks is also worrying as they seem to be at the top of a positive earning cycle.  One of the faults of fundamental analysis is that things always look best at the top.  However, all considered, US equities might be the default choice for 2012 as they are in a stronger position than European and Emerging Markets equities, more attractive than most fixed income instruments and probably less volatile than I expect commodities to be in the new year.

On the subject of commodities, I expect increased volatility as the result of a few factors: Europe, uncertain Middle East developments after the Arab Spring of 2011 and the MF Global fiasco.  The alleged criminal actions that took place at MF Global leading to its demise and the fumbled handling of the situation by most parties involved, especially the CFTC and the CME, have resulted in a negative structural issue with the commodities market.  The Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the largest commodity market in the world, has seen its trading volume cut by 10% since the MFG bankruptcy.  Part of this decrease is due to some trading funds still frozen at MFG but also to hedgers and speculators looking for alternatives to the futures market.  This is a very negative development as a healthy and efficient financial system needs a healthy, secure and transparent hedging market like futures.

I also expect Master Limited Partnerships (energy infrastructures) to continue to do well and outperform most sectors.  My long term play on natural gas and water remains, in my view, a centerpiece of any long term portfolios.

In conclusion, I will be expecting high levels of volatility in the first quarter of 2012 as we work through the European crisis; I will be monitoring closely the political debate in Europe and the actions (not the words) of the ECB.  Technically, I will also keep an eye to the correlations between the Euro banking sector and gold to spot potential turns in this saga.  Should I see the ECB become more aggressive in its own quantitative easing program, I shall expect gold to once again outperform.    On the equity side, I expect Master Limited Partnerships to remain a favorite buy on most dips.

One last element not to be forgotten is the US presidential election in November.  While not as pivotal as other past elections, the rhetoric of the political debate might turn nasty and prove destabilizing.  However, election years tend to be generally kind to the market as short term policies are hastily put in place to keep the incumbent president on the job.

One thing is for sure…we will not be bored!

Disclaimer: PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THEREFORE, NO CURRENT OR PROSPECTIVE CLIENT SHOULD ASSUME THAT FUTURE PERFORMANCE OF ANY SPECIFIC INVESTMENT AND/OR INVESTMENT STRATEGIES MADE REFERENCE TO ABOVE AND RECOMMENDED OR UNDERTAKEN BY CERVINO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, WILL BE PROFITABLE OR EQUAL THE CORRESPONDING INDICATED PERFORMANCE LEVELS. DIFFERENT TYPES OF INVESTMENTS INVOLVE VARYING DEGREES OF RISK, AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT ANY SPECIFIC INVESTMENT WILL EITHER BE SUITABLE OR PROFITABLE FOR A CLIENT OR PROSPECTIVE CLIENT'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO. HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR INVESTMENT INDICES AND/OR PORTFOLIO BENCHMARKS DO NOT REFLECT THE DEDUCTION OF TRANSACTION AND/OR CUSTODIAL CHARGES, THE DEDUCTION OF ADVISORY MANAGEMENT FEES, NOR THE IMPACT OF TAXES, THE INCURRENCE OF WHICH WOULD HAVE THE EFFECT OF DECREASING HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS.

HYPOTHETICAL RISK DISCLOSURE: HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN, IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.

The Importance of Market Structure

In my investment classes, I always stress to my students the importance of analyzing markets and building portfolios through four lenses:

-         fundamentals (relative valuation metrics, earnings cycles, macroeconomics, etc.)

-         technicals (support/resistance levels, moving averages, breadth, etc.)

-         sentiment (volatility measures, put and call ratios, CDS, etc.)

and…..

-         market structure.

The latter element is, in my view, the most important albeit the most difficult to research and forecast.  Market structure is that comprehensive box that relates to the rules of engagement for all market participants. 

Structure refers to the regulatory framework such as what behavior legislators and regulators may want to push forward but it also refers to the much more ethereal aspect of how such rules will be enforced and potentially “bent” in favor of certain investing classes. 

To this point, think of High Frequency Trading (HFT) and how the combination of technology interests and for-profit exchanges lead to large structural changes in the markets with numerous distortions in the way the constant price discovery process now works. HFT is not the only example in recent history; the introduction of commodity related Exchange Traded Funds lead to behavioral changes in the commodity markets due to the injection of a persistent long bias with retail characteristics in a traditionally institutional hedging market.

Historically we also witnessed other major structural changes that lead to long bullish waves such as rules in favors of equity investments as commonplace vehicles for retirement savings.

Understanding market structure will also force investors to research how the bigger players will align in the financial spectrum; this goes beyond following the smart money such as hedge fund managers and corporate raiders but more and more it has to do with fully understanding global politics and power plays.  Today’s investor should spend more time analyzing Central Bankers speeches and Heads of States political realities rather than pouring over balance sheets and income statements.

The real truth is that the “1% of the 1%” sets the rules of engagement and while most investors do not have a seat at that very exclusive table, in order to be successful at the investing game you must work through an analytical framework that will take you as close as possible.  One of the most significant realities of the unraveling of our financial markets since 2008 is that the rules of engagements are constantly being rewritten putting any investor in a more complex situation than ever before.  Structure is key but it is also now a fast moving target.  I believe that to a large extent this is one reason why traditional portfolio management approaches have failed miserably in this decade; as market structure became more negotiable and more unstable, it also became even more important yet more difficult to predict with the end result of undermining strategies established under the assumption of structural stability.

Successful investing in the next decade will require active political analysis and possibly an increased level of stakeholder’s activism in an attempt to be part of the rule making process.  Intense strategic geo-political analysis should also play part in the construction of every portfolio.  Legal expertise, now the domain of M&A and Distressed Securities traders, will probably become required talent for most money managers.

In conclusion, the world has become a lot more complex and unpredictable; successful investors will rise to the challenge by shedding old habits and stale formulas and embracing three-dimensional active analysis.

Are Financial Markets Doomed? MF Global Bankruptcy Strikes at the Core of Markets

Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way. LeoTolstoy, Anna Karenina, Chapter 1

In a bull market everyone is happy, the sky is the limit and we all feel like “wunderkinds”.  We see cracks but we disregard them as insignificant, we may notice incompetence and malice but the show must go on.

Then the inevitable moment of reckoning occurs, bull times turn into bears and the sky is suddenly not limitless but heavy and suffocating.  Disasters like the Lehman moment in 2008 happen and great destruction touches society at its core.  The only silver lining, you may think, is that something must be learned and that things can only get better from here.

Fast forward to the fall of 2011 and “enjoy” the MF Global moment.  The bankruptcy of this once powerful derivative broker may not have, so far, scared markets as much as Lehman but to the eyes of the careful analyst it is actually much more dangerous and systemically insidious.

MF Global had been around for more than 200 years facilitating commodity trading around the world; in some exchanges up to 80% of the volume was attributed to MF Global. This changed recently when disgraced ex New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine was chosen to run the firm.  Eighteen months later, MF Global is bankrupt thanks to a series of actions that make Lehman look like child’s play. 

Corzine levered up the firms’ capital to a ratio as high as 40 to 1 in risky bets on European sovereign debt.  Sounds like 2008 all over again? Weren’t we going to fix the leverage issue with banks? I guess not.  Corzine also levered his political capital to intimidate regulators in order to have rules changed or kept in his favor.  Doesn’t it sound very familiar again? But additionally, the MF saga really strikes a deadly blow to financial markets: while no formal indictments have been put forward yet, it is clear that $600 million of customer segregated funds have been lost, stolen, vaporized (you pick your favorite).  In commodity trading, customer funds are fully segregated from the bank capital to ensure safety in cases like bankruptcy.  It is the cornerstone of the brokerage industry.  The CFTC, the commodity regulatory body, is supposed to oversee this process and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (the largest derivative exchange in the US) is responsible for managing this process as well.

Almost three weeks after the filing of MF Global bankruptcy, customers of the bank still have their accounts frozen (only open positions were transferred to new brokers with a percentage of minimum margin needed to hold the exposure) and there are questions whether they will recover 100% of their funds. 

Even though customers are not part of the bankruptcy dynamic since their funds are outside of the bank’s balance sheet, the Trustee in charge of the process is holding everyone hostage.

If our financial markets cannot guarantee safety of funds deposited with brokers or banks, our economic system will fall into a dark medieval state that will impoverish all.  Liquidity will dry up, spreads will widen, prices and volatility will become intolerable.  While it is clear that the system of incentives in Wall Street continues to push at best risky behavior and at worst illegal activities, our regulators and legal system continue to abdicate their responsibilities.

This is very serious as people’s faith in financial markets cannot be broken once again.

Behavioral Investing

Take a look at the newly posted book review of James Montier book on behavioral investing..a few ideas form his book:

"....Montier also touches on the subject of bubbles in asset prices; how to define them and spot them and why they arise.  Along this subject, he writes about a series of behavioral tendencies that mark the human process when it comes to investing:

-          over-optimism which blinds us from the dangers posed by predictable surprises

-          illusion of control or the belief that we can influence the outcome of uncontrollable events

-          self-serving bias or the innate tendency to overweight information that validate our bias

-          inattentional blindness or the fact that we do not expect to see what we are not looking for....."

Read the whole review on the Book Review page

A room with a view…of the markets

September 27, 2011

Davide Accomazzo

Email: davide@cervinocapital.com

From the sometimes advantaged viewpoint of my trading room, let’s take a look at a variety of financial markets after what it could be called a “lively” quarter.

Equity markets around the world topped almost simultaneously at the beginning of the quarter (so much for diversification…) and initiated a vicious correction as a result of the renewed failure of Europeans to solve their sovereign debt issue, our domestic ineptitude related to fiscal policy and the subsequent Standard and Poor’s downgrade.

The SP 500 travelled a quick 20% to the downside perforating the 200 day moving average (the line between bull and bear market environment) like the Germans cut through the line Maginot some sixty years ago.  The WWII analogy is apropos since around the lowest point in the correction (August 8^th),  there were 67 declining stocks for every one that rose, the worst ratio in history going back to 1940 when German tanks broke thru French armies...even during the 1987 black Monday the ratio was not so negative (38 to 1).  This statistic shows the negativity associated with this move but it is also, most likely, the result of the predominant role of HFT and algo trading as we are getting more and more often this kind of really extreme market internals.

So far 1100 on the SP 500 seems to be strong support but I would not be surprised to see a quick and painful run at the round 1000 mark should Greece default (no.. it is not priced in yet…) or should our pathetic dance over our fiscal decisions be a repeat of the August near default.

From a technical point of view, we have an extreme number of stocks below their 10 week moving average and also below their 50 week moving average.  Such numbers have normally been followed by a rally.  Insiders buying was very positive at the bottom of the move and it has now moved to neutral but we do have the announcement by Warren Buffet of his first stock buyback.  Whether this is good news as it implies the market overall is cheap or it is bad news because the Oracle of Omaha can’t find good deals outside his own company is still unclear to me.

One thing is certain, volatility should stay with us until Santa Claus comes to town, so it is swing trading time for those with short time horizons or selective buying with some tail risk hedging for the long term investors.

Within the context of equities, our beloved sector (energy infrastructures related Master Limited Partnerships) has started to be attractive again on a spread basis versus the UST 10 year (over 400 basis points) and also versus the BBB benchmark.

Another market we follow closely, gold, has had an interesting quarter.  Gold experienced first a rally from a congestion area at 1500 to over 1900, then formed a double top and crashed back in typical shining metal fashion to an overnight low of 1533 and it is now trading around 1650.

The recent volatility of gold should not be surprising to most investors; the shining metal has a long history of violent swings to the upside and to the downside which are a reflection of what gold represents: a 5000 year hedge against fear.  Gold in itself produces no cash-flows and has very little industrial demand, therefore its price is largely dictated, and more disproportionately so in the last few years, by speculative flows.  In a world of disappearing trust in governments and institutions, 5000 years of trust become a useful characteristic; however, speculative funds are by definition shorter term and often leveraged, contributing to waves of swift and forced liquidation. The recent 400 point sell-off in gold is just the most recent example of gold volatile nature.

From a technical perspective, I expected gold to retrace to at least 1600 as that represented the level of the latest break-out; as previously mentioned, the December futures hit an overnight low of 1532.7, just a little higher than the 50 week moving average presently at 1500.63.  The 50 week m. a. has been a good trend indicator containing most retracements in the last few years.  Only in 2008 such level was broken significantly (albeit briefly) in the midst of the Lehman meltdown.

Looking forward, I continue to think that gold has regained an important place in most asset allocation models; therefore it should find a constant bid even though regular corrections will still mark its tempo.  The most likely scenario at this juncture should be a period of churning as the metal finds its new equilibrium and as it allows for a partial rotation of ownership from the most leveraged and shakiest hands to the longer term players.  Of course, just like all markets these days, we remain very headlines driven and should the Europeans fumble their responsibilities one more time, gold should find its footing much more quickly.

In regards to our Gold program, our strategy was built to respond exactly to this unnerving nature of gold.  Having a long term upside bias is one thing…being able to hold the position when in the midst of such highly volatile moves is quite another.  We built our collared strategy to capture the long term upside bias while significantly protecting our downside exposure.  We were always going to underperform parabolic moves to the upside but over the long term we should produce positive returns with much less volatility.  Volatility is a good friend of traders but a scary enemy of the longer term investor and gold demands a long term commitment as the financial and political world will require a long time to rebuild trust with all of us.

In FX, the US Dollar has regained some momentum as the Euro needed to price in its life threatening inconsistencies and the Yen was actively managed by the BOJ.  The Swiss Franc was run over by speculative funds looking for safety in a world where risk free is an oxymoron, and experienced some mind boggling moves until the Swiss Central Bank decided to peg to the Euro at the 1.2 level (later changed to 1.25). Their promise to print as many Swissies as necessary to stop the inflow of capital is a medicine that may end up killing the patient.  We are not trading this market at the moment but we watch intensely for future opportunities. 

The Swiss are not unique in their fight against undue currency appreciation; this is just Part Deux of the crisis.  In a world of shrinking aggregate demand, nobody wants to import capital (as it means exporting employment) and currency wars will continue to be our headache.

As far as the energy markets, we like crude oil as a trading affair into the end of the year where buying dips and selling rallies may produce profits.

Arrivederci!

Contact details:

davide@cervinocapital.com

Exotic Fixed Income

Prof. Davide Accomazzo

Email: davide@cervinocapital.com

In a universe of zero interest rates and demoted US Treasuries yielding negative real rates of returns (when accounting for inflation), the modern fixed income investor faces great challenges in order to capture reasonable risk adjusted yields.

In this piece we are going to take a look at two fixed income alternatives which are offering interesting possibilities in a field of disappearing opportunities: Emerging Market Corporates and Linkers also known in the US as Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS). 

Emerging Markets fixed income has normally been confined to Sovereign issues while the corporate sector was mostly localized and when offered to the international markets it was usually done via the institutional oriented EuroBond market and via small size issues.  However, EM Corporates are now an asset class that is coming of age in sync with the consistent growth of its underlying economies.  William Perry in the Journal of Indexes (September/October 2011 issue) highlights that the EM Corporate space has evolved from a market with a $20 billion in annual issuance volume to an average annual issuance in excess of $100 billion and a total outstanding size moving toward $1 trillion.

The growth of this asset class reflects the increasing economic power that emerging economies are yielding globally; in a world where developed economies are struggling with slowing GDPs and increasing debt burdens, the macroeconomic picture of developing markets is uncovering new opportunities.  As these economies develop, not only is their growth improving but so are their capital market structure and their legal framework; both elements help increase the value of Emerging Market Corporates.

Based on different macro metrics, it could be argued that the fundamentals of developing economies are indeed better than developed markets therefore a more significant allocation to EM Corporates may be where real opportunities lie.  One index that tries to replicate this new space is the Corporate Emerging Market Bond Index (CEMBI, William Perry in Journal of Indexes). This index reflects US denominated EM Corporates where Asia is represented at 41%, emerging Europe at 12.4%, Latin America at 28.47% and Middle East/Africa at 18.25%.

Another instrument with available global diversification and potentially more attractive real yields than traditional fixed income are Inflation Linked Bonds.  Such instruments are designed to guarantee investors a real rate of return regardless of inflation.  The coupon and the principal can be adjusted to deliver a real rate of return.  These are great tools for those investors that fear strong inflationary pressures may be the end result of our present fiscal and monetary policies.  Linkers are issued by governments around the world providing investors with a truly global menu; the US, Italy, Japan, France, the UK and most Emerging Economies are all large issuers of Linkers. 

One word of caution, especially for the retail investor, is the different characteristics of gaining exposure via individual Linkers or funds.  A typical fund will target a constant duration which may or not (unless the exposure is actively managed by the individual investor) be the best approach to match the investor’s future liabilities. Also funds (such as ETFs) could become overbought or oversold depending on market sentiment distorting the ultimate total return to the investor and potentially negating the sought after inflation protection.

 Contact details: davide@cervinocapital.com